Case Results · Jones Act · Maritime

Confidential — Result · Jones Act — Chevron U.S.A., Inc.

Chevron’s own vessel work list had already flagged the stairs she fell on. The company kept her aboard anyway — painting, in a sling. The case resolved weeks before a Harris County jury would have heard all of it.

ResultConfidential
ResolvedWeeks before trial, Harris County
Lead counselBrian Beckcom
Case typeJones Act

Rust does not appear overnight

The exterior stairs near the tanker’s manifold were steep, heavily worn, and losing their nonskid surface. Rust like that is not a surprise. It is a record — of every inspection that saw it and every work order that never came. When an able seaman fell on those stairs aboard the Florida Voyager, a Chevron tanker, she injured her neck and shoulder in a way that would eventually require surgeons to replace a disc in her cervical spine.

Chevron would later produce — late, and only after six separate rounds of document requests — its own vessel work list. The stairs around the manifold were on it, formally identified as needing repair. The company’s paperwork knew what the company’s lawyers spent a year denying.

Kept aboard, painting in a sling

What Chevron did after the fall became the second half of the case. There was no real medical exam and no imaging. The captain kept her working aboard the vessel — in his words, because there was no other able seaman available. A staffing decision, dressed up as a medical one.

So a woman with an injured neck and shoulder was assigned painting, cleaning, and stenciling while wearing a sling, under a no-lifting restriction. Her own union agreement said a mariner fit only for light duty was not eligible to work a vessel at all — a provision the captain, at his deposition, admitted he did not know existed. Chevron’s own medical policy required repatriating an injured worker who cannot perform her duties. It did not happen.

The delay had a cost. Her treating surgeon would testify that, more likely than not, the delay in getting her to surgery made her condition worse. In April 2025 she underwent a C5-6 artificial disc replacement — a surgery whose price Chevron’s own claim file had been carrying for months while the company said it didn’t know.

The defense playbook, and what happened to it

Chevron ran the standard plays. A defense medical examiner called her injuries degenerative — and admitted under oath he had not reviewed her imaging. Two rounds of surveillance produced nothing inconsistent with her injuries, because there was nothing to find. Its lawyers argued she should have climbed down the stairway backwards, like a ladder, and called the chipped nonskid normal wear.

The answer to every play was the same: Chevron’s own documents, Chevron’s own witnesses, Chevron’s own policies — worked up for a Harris County jury on the court’s first trial setting.

The result

With jury selection weeks away, the case resolved — confidentially, and a long way from the number Chevron opened with. Brian Beckcom served as lead counsel.

She got the surgery, the future care plan, and the answer the company owed her from the beginning.

What the evidence showed

Every fact below came from Chevron’s own witnesses, documents, and policies.

  1. Chevron’s own 2025-2026 vessel work list — produced late in discovery — had already flagged the manifold stairs as needing repair.
  2. The captain testified she was kept aboard injured because there was no other able seaman available.
  3. Internal company emails confirmed she was assigned painting while wearing a sling on a no-lifting restriction.
  4. Her union agreement barred light-duty mariners from working a vessel — the captain admitted he didn’t know the provision existed.
  5. Chevron’s shoreside claim file carried the cost estimate for her surgery months before the company claimed it first learned of it.
  6. The defense medical examiner admitted he had not reviewed her imaging before calling her injuries degenerative.

The offer, and the answer

Chevron’s first offer$150,000
Resolved, weeks before trialConfidential

The distance between Chevron’s opening number and where this case ended wasn’t luck — it was a case built for a jury out of Chevron’s own paperwork, with a trial date the company believed.

Every case is different. Prior results depend on the facts of the individual case and do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Tell us what happened

If something like this happened to you or someone in your family, that is exactly the conversation to have. The first one is free, and you will get a straight answer.

Call our office directly for a free and confidential case review.

(877) 724-7800

No fees unless we win your case

No fees unless we win. Confidential evaluation.