Case at a glance
- Recovery: $850,000 Settlement
- Injury: Neck and back injuries; three-level cervical fusion
- Practice: Transportation Accidents
- Attorney: Vuk Vujasinovic
A collision followed by lasting neck problems
David injured his neck and back in the collision. More than a year later, he underwent a three-level cervical fusion. His claim addressed medical treatment, time away from work and the effect of his injuries on his future earning ability.
The defense disputed both the collision and the injuries. It argued that David had backed into the other bus and that his neck condition reflected preexisting degeneration rather than the crash. David’s lawsuit alleged that the other driver failed to keep a proper lookout and brake in time.
Why a bus collision requires more than a car-crash checklist
A bus crash can raise questions about both a driver's conduct and the company operating the vehicle. David's lawsuit alleged that the other driver failed to watch the road and brake in time, and that MomentumAir failed in supervision and training. The defense disputed those allegations, including how the buses came into contact.
Depending on the operation, relevant evidence can include driver qualifications, training, maintenance records and available vehicle or airport footage. For operations covered by the federal motor-carrier regulations, 49 C.F.R. §391.11 sets driver-qualification requirements, while §396.3 requires systematic inspection, repair and maintenance. A lawyer must check coverage and exceptions for the particular bus and service; an airport location alone does not establish which rules apply.
A neck fusion can have lasting consequences
David underwent a three-level cervical fusion. A fusion joins vertebrae so they heal into one solid bone and stops motion at those fused levels. It is a lasting change to the spine, but that does not mean every patient experiences lifelong pain or disability. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons explains that the effect on movement depends on the particular operation and that many fusions do not significantly limit overall motion.
For an injury claim, the work is to document the individual patient's outcome: medical treatment, work restrictions, future earning capacity and any supported future care. David's claim addressed those consequences, while the defense argued that degeneration—not the collision—explained his neck condition. Vuk pursued a recovery addressing David's injuries and their effect on his ability to work.
An $850,000 settlement before trial
The lawsuit was brought in Harris County. Eleven days before the scheduled trial, the case resolved through an $850,000 settlement.
Related legal help
Learn about transportation accident claims.
To discuss a serious injury, call 877-724-7800 for a free consultation.
Every case is different. Prior results depend on the facts of the individual case and do not guarantee a similar outcome.