Representing the injured worker, attorney Vuk Vujasinovic of VB Attorneys initiated a comprehensive legal investigation and filed a third-party personal injury lawsuit in Harris County, Texas. By focusing on industrial cleaning protocols, contractor liability, safety certification standards, and long-term life care planning, Vuk established clear third-party liability against the off-site cleaning facility. The litigation ultimately resulted in a substantial Confidential Lifetime Structured Settlement, providing the client with permanent financial security and lifetime medical support.
Acid remained inside the trailer
Sulphuric acid (H₂SO₄) is one of the most hazardous industrial chemicals transported across the United States. It is a highly corrosive, strong mineral acid capable of causing immediate chemical burns, severe thermal reactions, and severe tissue destruction upon contact with human skin or biological membranes. When concentrated sulphuric acid comes into contact with ocular tissue, it rapidly penetrates the cornea and anterior chamber of the eye, causing irreversible protein denaturation, corneal opacification, glaucoma, and complete destruction of internal eye structures.
In commercial transportation, dedicated tanker trailers that carry sulphuric acid must undergo rigorous washouts and chemical neutralization procedures at specialized industrial cleaning facilities before being cleared for maintenance, inspection, or re-use. The off-site cleaning contractor assigned to wash this tanker trailer issued a formal Certificate of Cleanliness, explicitly attesting that the interior cargo vessel had been thoroughly scrubbed, chemically neutralized, rinsed, and verified safe for personnel access.
Relying on this official certification, the worker proceeded with standard post-cleaning procedures. However, due to inadequate cleaning techniques, improper flushing, and a failure to perform adequate chemical testing or internal vapor checks, a significant volume of concentrated sulphuric acid remained pooled inside the trailer. As the worker unsealed the trailer’s access point, trapped chemical residue splashed out, spraying directly into his face and eyes.
The immediate physical impact was devastating. The worker was rushed to emergency trauma care, undergoing urgent ocular irrigation and specialized medical interventions. Over the following months, he underwent multiple complex eye surgeries, including corneal transplants, reconstructive eyelid procedures, and pressure-relieving operations designed to salvage his sight.
Despite exhaustive surgical attempts and extensive specialized medical care, doctors could not restore his vision. The chemical burns resulted in permanent, complete blindness in one eye and severe, irreversible partial vision loss in the remaining eye. Beyond the physical loss of sight, the trauma caused severe chronic pain, photosensitivity, continuous emotional distress, and profound disruption to his life. The permanent nature of his vision impairment meant he could no longer perform his job, drive a motor vehicle, or navigate daily environments without continuous assistance.
The certificate and the cleaning work
While workers’ compensation benefits may provide limited, no-fault coverage for employees injured on the job, workers’ comp rarely covers the full extent of catastrophic, life-altering injuries, nor does it compensate for pain and suffering or full economic loss. Under Texas law, when an injury is caused by the negligence of an independent entity other than the direct employer—such as an off-site contractor or equipment vendor—the injured worker has the legal right to pursue a third-party personal injury lawsuit.
Vuk Vujasinovic evaluated the case and identified clear third-party liability on the part of the independent cleaning facility. The industrial cleaning contractor owed a duty of reasonable care to perform a complete chemical neutralization and thorough inspection of the tanker trailer before releasing it back into commercial service. Issuing a false or negligent Certificate of Cleanliness constituted a severe breach of industry safety standards and created an immediate, deadly hazard for downstream workers.
Vuk filed a comprehensive third-party lawsuit in Harris County, Texas, alleging gross negligence, failure to follow chemical wash protocols, negligent misrepresentation regarding the cleanliness certificate, and failure to warn of chemical hazards. The lawsuit sought full compensatory damages, including past and future medical expenses, loss of earning capacity, physical pain, mental anguish, physical impairment, and disfigurement.
The certificate documented that the trailer had been represented as clean and safe. The litigation examined that representation alongside the chemical that remained inside and the exposure that followed.
Developing the liability and medical evidence
To establish legal liability and prove the full extent of the client’s damages, Vuk Vujasinovic mounted a rigorous discovery campaign. He retained leading industrial safety experts, hazardous material specialists, chemical engineers, and commercial cleaning consultants to examine the facility’s wash procedures, water pressure thresholds, chemical testing logs, and quality control measures. The investigation revealed significant lapses in safety protocols, insufficient chemical testing prior to sign-off, and a systemic failure to verify that hazardous residue was fully removed from internal tanker sumps.
During the litigation, Vuk conducted over 20 detailed depositions. Key testimony was taken from the cleaning facility’s technicians, safety managers, quality assurance inspectors, corporate representatives, and eyewash maintenance personnel. Through methodical cross-examination, he exposed discrepancies between the written safety guidelines and the actual practices followed on the wash floor, proving that the Certificate of Cleanliness was signed without adequate verification.
Proving the long-term impact of catastrophic vision loss required specialized medical and economic expertise. Vuk partnered with top ophthalmologists, oculoplastic surgeons, neuro-ophthalmologists, and vocational rehabilitation experts to present clear, evidence-based assessments of the client’s permanent disability.
A comprehensive Life Care Plan was developed by certified life care planners to project the client’s long-term medical and daily living needs. The plan detailed mandatory future medical care, including routine specialist visits, potential future surgeries, ocular prosthetics, prescription medications, specialized low-vision aids, home mobility modifications, adaptive technologies, and personal care assistant support. Concurrently, forensic economic experts calculated the substantial loss of lifetime earning capacity, accounting for wage growth, inflation, and lost fringe benefits resulting from his inability to remain in the workforce.
Life care planning addressed those continuing needs. The case required an account of the cleaning contractor’s work, the cause of the exposure, and the assistance the worker would need after treatment.
A Confidential Settlement with monthly support
Armed with overwhelming expert testimony, safety documentation, and economic proof, Vuk Vujasinovic represented the client through intensive negotiations and a second formal mediation session. Facing significant trial exposure and clear proof of contractor liability, the defense agreed to a resolution via a Confidential Settlement. While the financial terms remain confidential, the settlement provided full financial recovery for the catastrophic harm caused by the contractor’s negligence.
A key component of the settlement was the establishment of a structured settlement annuity tailored to provide financial security over the client’s entire lifetime. Unlike a single lump-sum payout, a structured settlement distributes payments over time through tax-free guaranteed annuity distributions, securing long-term economic stability.
For a worker facing permanent disability and ongoing medical expenses, structured settlements offer crucial advantages: continuous monthly income to replace lost wages, dedicated funds for periodic medical needs, protection against market volatility or financial mismanagment, and tax-exempt status under federal tax law. This lifetime financial structure ensured that the client would remain fully supported, receiving guaranteed monthly payments to cover living and medical expenses throughout his life.
What the evidence showed
- The cleaning certificate. It represented that the trailer had been properly cleaned and was safe for further work.
- The remaining acid. The case examined how sulphuric acid remained inside the returned trailer and caused the exposure.
- The contractor’s work. Workplace safety experts and depositions addressed the cleaning process and the negligence claim.
- Permanent vision loss. Medical evidence distinguished blindness in one eye from partial blindness in the other.
- Future care. Medical and life care planning evidence addressed the worker’s continuing needs.
More from the record
Frequently Asked Questions
Every case is different. Prior results depend on the facts of the individual case and do not guarantee a similar outcome.