Interested in working with us? Call us Toll Free at 1.877.724.7800 or fill out this quick form and we will contact you within 24 hours!
We designed this website to provide information to consumers, injured people, and their families. Our goal is to level the playing field between consumers and insurance companies and expose the tricks, traps, and techniques they use to cheat injured people out of their legal rights. We also let consumers know about legal news, including verdicts and settlements and other interesting legal information.
But please understand that nothing on this website is meant to provide legal information about your specific case, create an attorney-client relationship, or imply that the results of your legal case will be the same as some other case.
| Negligence |
| Company man in Yemen was victim of shooting rampage
|
| Settlement: Confidential |
| Case Type: Negligent Supervision, Premises Liability - Inadequate or Negligent Security, Wrongful Death - Survival Damages |
| Case: Confidential Surviving Spouse and Four Surviving Adult Children v. Confidential Drilling Contractor |
| Venue: Harris County District Court, 151st, TX |
| Judge: Caroline Baker |
| Date: 04-19-2007 |
| PLAINTIFF(S) |
Attorney:
|
Expert:
|
| DEFENDANT(S) |
Attorney:
|
Expert:
|
| Facts: On March 18, 2003, plaintiffs' decedent, a 64-year-old employee of an oil rig operator, was working in Yemen when he was killed during a shooting rampage perpetrated by an employee of a drilling contractor hired by the decedent's employer. Using a 9mm Russian Makarov pistol, the shooter wounded the rig mechanic and killed the rig manager, the decedent and a co-worker before killing himself. The decedent's widow and four adult children sued the drilling contractor for premises liability and negligent supervision. Although there were about 40 Yemen military personnel at the site, the plaintiffs' security expert testified they were ineffective as security. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendant, based on its contract with the operator, retained control over security at the site. In his deposition, the defendant's corporate representative acknowledged that the company was aware of Yemen 's history of terrorism, including the October 2000 bombing of the USS Cole and the escalation of violence in response to the U.S. war against Iraq, and that the company intentionally breached a contractual provision requiring it to provide security. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendant should have provided security guards that were its own employees. Regarding negligent supervision, the plaintiffs put on evidence that many employees of the defendant used "qat," a stimulant, at the site every day. Qat is a controlled substance under U.S. law, but this fact was excluded at trial. The plaintiffs further claimed that the shooter was connected to Al Qaeda, had a gun at the site for several months, was having problems with depression, was taking Valium prescribed by the rig medic, had a history of mental illness and had stated that he was a victim of injustice at the hands of oil companies. At trial, the defendant's field superintendent acknowledged that the company violated work policies that applied to this site. The defendant denied retaining control over security and asserted that the operator, including the decedent, and the Yemen military jointly controlled security, based on written agreements between the operator and the Yemen military. The defendant denied awareness of an unreasonable risk of harm from its employees at the site, and denied that the shooter presented a risk of harm that was reasonably foreseeable before the incident. The defendant designated the shooter and the Yemen military as responsible third parties. A defense motion denying that Texas courts had jurisdiction and a defense motion to apply Yemen law (which would have effectively barred any recovery) were both denied. More than 35 depositions were taken, including several in Dubai and others in various cities around the U.S.
|
Injury: The decedent was shot in the back., and the bullet punctured his heart and exited his chest. The estate claimed three to five minutes of pain and suffering, during which the decedent cried out audibly. The decedent's widow, three adult sons and sole adult daughter claimed past lost wages and loss of future wage earning capacity. The sons who testified said that the family was very close; one of them cried throughout his testimony, said defense counsel.
|
Verdict Information The defendant settled with the plaintiffs for a confidential sum on the 14th day of trial. It was two or three days after the Virginia Tech massacre and the day before the plaintiffs intended to rest their case. The shooting occurred during the 24-hour period between President Bush's announcement of the Iraq War and the U.S.'s commencement of bombing.
|
Editor's Comments This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs' and defense counsel.
|
Result: Confidential
Above are representative settlements and verdicts pursued and won by Vujasinovic & Beckcom P.L.L.C. Please note that every case is different and these verdicts and settlements, while accurate, do not represent what we may obtain for you in your case. Nor does it mean that we win all of our cases - we don't. Our clients tell us that knowing that we have achieved significant results, both by settlement and by jury verdict, is one factor that many of them used to decide to hire us. You certainly should ask any prospective attorney whether he or she has obtained significant verdicts and settlements but the decision to hire an attorney should not be made on this factor alone. We would be more than happy to discuss any of these cases, and many others, with you.
Contact us for a consultation today.
Vujasinovic & Beckcom P.L.L.C
1001 Texas Avenue
Suite 1020
Houston, TX 77002
Phone: 713.224.7800
Fax: 713.224.7801